![]()
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
Click on Image to Order Chapter 1 Revolution, L. noun1
Revolutions, as we now know them, are both linear and circular phenomena. The original use of the word, from the Middle Ages until the late eighteenth century, predominantly meant a circular type of action . . . like those indicated in the first four definitions. For example, an entity started in one point, moved away from it, and returned ultimately to the starting point, i.e., a type of orbit. However, during the last two hundred years, revolution has experienced a semantic shift. As well as a circular meaning, it also developed a linear one (definitions five through seven) that focused on change, particularly in a radical social change that impacts phenomena occurring after it in a chronological time. Semantically, revolution then experienced a revolution! In this text, I probe both of these aspects by exploring a circular response in the wake of linear events. In the wakes of two revolutions, the French Revolution (1789-99) and our contemporary "technological revolution," Catholics have gathered in small groups to try and figure things out. Whereas we tend to view the two revolutions as series of linear events, taking place chronologically, we view the responses, of gathering in small communities to reflect and effect change in the world, as revolutions in the circular sense. This text grew out of a number of conversations with members of the Marianist Family during the past decade. In these conversations, we consistently found ourselves connecting the anomie of our time with the time of the Marianist foundation in the aftermath of the French Revolution. A resemblance between these two horizons became apparent to us in these conversations as we recognized the Chaminadian moment as kindred to our own. This is an exploration of that recognition, of how the revolutionary horizon of Chaminade's France resonates within, through, and beneath the information horizon of contemporary American life. In this text, I examine these two moments in the history of the small-faith-community story in an attempt to gain insight into our contemporary moment through the lens of the Marianist foundational moment. I attempt to read these moments as a "text" from which we may render an interpretation of the webs of significance of these two distinct historical horizons. As Bernard Lee, SM, has reminded us, it is important to remember the distinctive character of each text as generated from its own horizon.
Click to view:
1Definition adapted from The Oxford English Dictionary, vol. III, P-Z (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1987).
|
All text and graphics are property of NACMS Copyright ©2008
North American Center for
Marianist Studies (NACMS)
4435 East Patterson Road
Dayton, Ohio 45430-1083
937/ 429-2521