![]()
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
Whats this about the fulcrum?Circular No. 7, "With Blessed Father Chaminade toward Our Future,"includes the quotation from William Joseph Chaminade concerning a new fulcrum. The circular was written by David Joseph Fleming, SM to commemorate September 3, 2000, the day of the beatification of our Founder. NACMS has received several inquiries about the source of this quotation; because the background may be of general interest, we present it here. In Blessed William Joseph Chaminade, Founder of the Marianist Family, Vincent Gizard, SM, writes (pages 68-69): "This Sodalitys success [Bordeaux] did not occur without evoking some resentment and difficulties with the parishes. Several objections were posed, and in 1824, Chaminade responded in a statement which merits our examination. The first objection was that "every age, every state of life, and every social condition were found all together in the Sodality. And above all, what cannot be tolerated are these public meetings." A second objection dealt with the relationship between the Sodality and the parishes. Was not the Sodality spirit opposed, in general, to the parish spirit? The third objection, to which Chaminade responds, is the section in which the quotation is found. Here is the relevant text. Answers to Objections That Are Ordinarily Made against Sodalities Established on the Plan of the One of Bordeaux, on the Form Given Them, and on Their Relations with Parishes Third Objection: How much good have not the older Sodalities accomplished during the three hundred years of their existence! Now, these Sodalities, established at first by the Jesuit Fathers in their colleges, from which they passed to the people, included in their membership only those of the same condition in life. Why not hold fast to the tradition and experience of the past, rather than found Sodalities modeled on a new plan whose success, to say the least, is very doubtful? Answer: At the risk of repetitionfor it was already saidI maintain that this enterprise is no venture. A practice that has been tried out during the space of twenty-four years in Bordeaux and elsewhere is no longer an experiment! Everyone is aware of the good spirit that reigns in Bordeaux, and how the people, in general, are loyal to religion and correct principles. We do not claim that these results are the outcome of the Sodality: but you will concede on this subject the testimony of enlightened persons, who say that a nucleus of good men, in a populous city, may powerfully uphold and maintain correct principles, like a pillar which supports an edifice, though in itself, it is but a small part of it. However, let us give a direct answer to the objection made: "What benefit is there in founding Sodalities on a new model?" Why, may I ask, is not the general state of things at the present time the same as it was heretofore? Why must everyday conditions be met with vaster, and more improved modern methods, than years ago? Who does not see that since the Revolution, a new fulcrum must be found for the lever that moves the modern world? Posed in its simplest form, the objection reduces itself to the examination, whether the new Sodalities offer more abundant means and resources than the old. We believe firmly they do. The new Sodalities differ from the old principally in five points, which, in my opinion, leave the advantage with the former.
Moreover, as these meetings are held in public, they may easily be supervised and inspected by the civil and ecclesiastical authorities, should such an occasion arise. This alone will allay all fear of causing offence to one or the other. The full text of the letter, which includes three additional objections and Chaminades reply, can be found in The Spirit of Our Foundation (Dayton, Ohio: Mount St. John Normal School, 1920), vol. 3, 231-40.
|
All text and graphics are property of NACMS Copyright ©2010
North American Center for
Marianist Studies (NACMS)
4435 East Patterson Road
Dayton, Ohio 45430-1083
937/ 429-2521